Speculators Could Drive Uranium to $55/Pound - or Higher

SUMMARY: TradeTech LLC Chief Executive Genehigher than the market at the time. Basically, you
Clark talked with StockInterview about the uranium bullreached a point where the cheap stuff has been sold.
market, where his price models show uranium pricesNow, we have to actually spend some money, some
heading and when to expect the peak of the currentcapital, to build new facilities, new mines and new mills.
upward cycle of the bull market. When will "hard" timesThat was, I think, the earliest signal of the price needing
again hit the uranium market, and how long will theto adjust.StockInterview: Isn't there a ton of hype
trough last? And what does the future hold for theacross all media channels about the "nuclear
uranium price? An industry insider gives us hisrenaissance" and the demand for more nuclear
insights.StockInterview: When the uranium bull marketenergy?Gene Clark:
began, did you foresee $40/pound uranium, now thatFirst of all, all the hype about nuclear renaissance is
the spot price has risen above this level?Gene Clark: Ireally in the United States. The Chinese have had plans
don't think any of us saw $40 per pound coming. Weto expand for a long time. The Japanese have been
had price projections at the time that indicatedsteadily adding new capacity. Koreans have been
probably $25 per pound, which would be a long termadding new capacity. Indians have been adding new
equilibrium price in constant dollar terms. But, I think itcapacity all along, all the way through this, even before
was a surprise the price went up so high. I think what'swe started this discussion on nuclear renaissance. I
going, the biggest factor right now, is the advent of thethink that phrase is really focused more in the United
so called hedge funds or speculator funds and otherStates, which really hasn't ordered a plant since 1976
such groups. The price started to go up, and theyor something like that. There is a boom. Maybe it's the
came into the market with the express purpose ofuranium renaissance.StockInterview: Is all of what
buying for holding and then selling into the market laterwe've been reading just plain hype?Gene Clark: There
to realize the trading profit. In 2005, the hedge fundsis some hype, but there is also some substance. A
were responsible for purchasing about 10 million poundspart of it is certainly a change in public attitude about
of the 29 million pounds purchased. I think the market isnuclear power. If I was riding on an airplane, ten years
now finally adjusting to the realities of primary supplyago, and someone asked me what I did for a living, I
and demand. It's been a depressed market for 20 orwas guaranteed to have a lousy trip, arguing about
30 years, primarily from the draw down of excessnuclear power. When I mention it now, I get a positive
inventories, and what we call secondaryresponse. There's been a marked shift in public attitude
supply.StockInterview: Will the speculators remainabout nuclear power. From the standpoint of the utilities
active in driving the spot uranium price higher?Genethat would be ordering nuclear plants. To the extent
Clark: I think there is still some room for furtherthat they need new capacity, looking at nuclear now is
speculation activity. Uranium Participation Corporation,not off the drawing boards, partly because of public
for example, is rumored to be about to come to theattitude. The industry has been moving through this
equities market again to raise funds for anothertrough period, preparing itself for a new era. It remains
purchase. They're asking for authority to buy UF6, asto be seen when the first order comes. But when the
well as U308, and different forms of uranium than theyfirst actual order of a nuclear power plant, along with
were locked into before. Whether it be at the 10 millionthe license application does come, I think you'll see
pound level (size of purchase), I think it kind of dependsseveral U.S. utilities following, probably five utilities very
on where the market goes. If it tends to flatten out,actively involved.StockInterview: When will that actually
then I think there's going to be obviously less interesthappen?Gene Clark: I think it will come within the next
on their part. When they were active in the market,five years, the ordering process. Of course it will be
they, of course, wanted the price to go up. Therefore,probably another eight years before we actually see
they weren't too careful about what they paid forthe first power plant from that process. We're talking
uranium. I think that's a part of it. In the long run, it wasprobably about 13 years. That's how long it takes. You
due for a readjustment to reflect prices of the cost ofcan actually construct one in 48 months, but you have
new production facilities. But, the hedge funds came into have been through the licensing. If you don't believe
and overdrove the market. Eventually, what it's goingthe anti-nuclear people are going to be psyched up to
to wind up doing is, if they sell off, it could have thefight the first plant coming through, then you'd be very
impact of driving prices back down below where theynaïve. The first one is going to be more difficult
would otherwise have gone.StockInterview: Did theand take more time, I think.StockInterview: One
speculators interfere with the trading efficiency of theanti-nuclear group told us they do not believe we'll
uranium market?Gene Clark: In theory, speculatorshave more nuclear power plants in the United
come in, tend to take the risk and smooth out marketStates.Gene Clark: That's possible, but given the
prices. But, it never really works out that way. Theycurrent circumstances, my guess is we will have more
always come in and only take the risk, if there's annuclear plants. We need the capacity, whether we're
opportunity to make money. So some people make agoing to build coal plants (or other types of power
lot of money. It does tend to upset the market. If yougenerating plants). I just came from California, moved
get away from the primary users of uranium andhere (to North Carolina) six months ago. They were
primary producers of uranium as your markettalking in California about building gas-fired plants for
participants, then you tend to introduce more noisebase load generation, which is the most ridiculous thing
than you would like.StockInterview: With that in mind, inyou can imagine. The plants are cheap to build, but the
which direction are your price projections going?Genefuel cost is exorbitant. I did a speech a couple of years
Clark: We're actually updating our uranium priceago, having looked at the Energy Information
forecast right now. We haven't decided on aAdministration's projections of gas demand. All the
reference case yet. The reference cases we'regrowth in natural gas demand is going to be in the
looking at will peak at about $50 to $55 per pound inelectric utility sector. We are going to be importing 60
about three years, and will then drop off prettypercent of our gas supplies by 2020. Does that make
drastically. It has to do with a selling of the speculatorany sense? No. We have a lot of coal, but there are
reserves, the uranium that's being held (for speculativelots of complaints about coal burning. In our state of
purposes). I can see it coming back down to $30,North Carolina, the attorney general is actually suing the
maybe below $30 per pound. Then, in the long run -Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) for the damage
out through 2020 - getting easily back up over $40 perfrom coal burning of the TVA's power plants in the
pound.StockInterview: Are you predicting a down cycleadjacent state, in Tennessee. There's going to be
during the course of the uranium bull market?Genecontinued pressure on coal burning. I think nuclear has
Clark: Yes. It's pretty consistent with everything we'reas good a shot as any in terms of new
doing with the changes in requirements, in differentcapacity.StockInterview: Some critics have argued
cases of high, low, and medium demand. Our modelingChina and India will not be able to afford the massive
system is projecting this. It has to do with the supplynuclear power plant build up they've envisioned.Gene
and demand balance and the cost on the margin. TheClark: If you think the Chinese are going to have any
way to describe it is that prices have come to a pointproblem financing things, you'd better think twice. Let's
now of higher than we would have projected them tofocus on India. India is a clear case where, and it is a
be, such that over-supply is going to evolve. The largegood rule of thumb, one percent growth in gross
low cost projects will reach a point where supply thendomestic product requires one percent growth in
overshoots demand for a few years, which causeselectricity requirement. For India to grow economically, it
the price to come back down. Then demand growth, inneeds electric power. Where are they going to get it?
the long run, picks up and puts a lot of pressure on theThey have coal plants there, as well. Once you use up
supply market to be able to meet the demand. So youall your hydro capacity, you really don't have much to
wind up with pressure toward the end of thechoose from, except coal, natural gas, and nuclear. To
period.StockInterview: But the markets are finicky, filledthe extent that they can have economic growth and
with variables, and can frequently trick priceexport income, coming into their country, they would be
models.Gene Clark: Here's what it would take to shootable to finance nuclear power plants. My guess is
that down: We have a problem with small numbers,they're going to get the vendors of the nuclear plant to
and there are some very large projects - Cigar Lake,help finance them.StockInterview: Are you talking about
for example. The expansion of Olympic Dam inthe French?Gene Clark: Framatome - the company
Australia would be going from about 12 million poundsthat constructs the nuclear plants. Financing is generally
of production to over 30 million pounds, if they finish. Ifpart of the package. The first plants in China were
you shift that out by four or five years, or if the ownerbasically financed by the French government. If the
decides, "No, we're not going to expand at all," youFrench go into India, you'll see the same thing. The
have a drastic effect. Then you would wind up withRussians have financed plants for developing countries.
$100 per pound uranium, I think.StockInterview: WhatThat's not unusual for them to do. The United States
are your estimates on the peak price years and themay, or may not, get involved. I think there have been
bottom years?Gene Clark: A lot of things couldsome types of guarantees in the past, but not at the
change, but here is what we're looking at. In one casesame level as the Russians and French do it. I think
scenario, the speculators are really going to stay out ofthose are the big choices. I wouldn't be surprised to
the market and holding onto their stuff for a long time.see the South Koreans involved in the reactor export
If so, then we're going to be at the peak by the end ofmarket. They've pretty much developed their own
this year. If they stay active in the market and buying,technology now. They have the capability of building
then that stretches it out further. Depending on the100 percent of a nuclear power plant in South Korea:
scenario, we see the peak possibly at 2008 or so. Ithe pressure vessels, all the steel requirements. They
would say we're looking at a trough around thecan do it all. We really haven't seen them export yet,
timeframe of 2011 to 2013. Then back up afterbecause they've used up all their manufacturing
that.StockInterview: How do you arrive at your weeklycapacity for their own program. At some stage, I
numbers for the spot uranium price?Gene Clark: Wewouldn't be surprised to see that happen. And I think
get our data from all of the key sources: the utility fuelthey would be able to finance reactor export
managers, sales staff and management of uraniumsales.StockInterview: How are the U.S. utilities going to
producers and processors, and uranium traders,fare in getting their "share" of uranium to fuel our
brokers and asset managers. Some are, of course,domestic nuclear power plants in the context of the
more cooperative than others, and whom we callapparent overwhelming Asian demand?Gene Clark: In
depends on the type of information we are seeking.reality, the U.S. utilities, which tend to wait longer to
Since our price indicators are a judgment call, we oftencontract, may be the ones on the losing end because
focus on the losers in particular recent transactions, asthe Chinese and the Indians will contract early. The
those will be the next to make offers in theimplication of current group-think is that the Chinese
market.StockInterview: Let's back up a bit. Why hasand Indians are not going to be able to find enough
uranium gone up past the levels of the "cost ofuranium for their new plants. But, they are committing
production," which would place the spot price betweenfor supplies way out into the future. When the U.S.
$25 and $35/pound?Gene Clark: The biggest factor, inutilities come to the market, they're going to look
signaling the market, was when utilities went out foraround say, "Oh blankety- blank, what happened?
long term bid requests. They found they reached aWhere's the uranium?" They'll be the ones that sat
period in which producers would have to build newaround. I think that is what's going to happen unless
facilities. Producers building those facilities felt, "I have tothings really change in the way contracting is done in
make at least enough profit to cover a return on thethe United States.James Finch contributes to and other
construction costs for these facilities." That was muchpublications.