Foreclosure Tsunami Continues in California

The foreclosure tsunami in California continuesmonths) when the lender started the default process.
unabated. More foreclosures were started in CaliforniaThe borrowers owed a median $11,126 in unpaid
during the second quarter of 2007 than anymortgage payments. In other words, once the
comparable period in over ten years. We need to goforeclosure starts, the borrower has the choice to
all the way back to 1997 to see such record volumeeither "reinstate" the loan by paying the $11,126 arrears,
of foreclosures within the state. What has caused thisor "redeem" the loan (later in the foreclosure process)
tsumani? It has been caused by the "perfect storm" ofby paying the loan balance (i.e. $342,000) and the
depreciating home prices, anemic sales, re-settingarrearage (i.e. $11,126). Obviously, reinstating is preferred
adjustable rate loans, and the mortgage meltdown into redeeming.
the financing sector.The median age of these defaulted loans is 16 months,
When we analyze the statistics, we can see that thewhich corresponds to the peak of loan originations in
vast majority of the loans that went sour wereAugust of 2005. And, as we all know, the primary loan
originated by lenders between the summers of 2005utilized for purchasing home during that period was the
and 2006. If you remember those halcyon days, real1. Notices of Default.
estate appreciation was still in double-digits and weThe first step in the foreclosure process in California is
were experiencing the tail-end of historically lowthe recording of a Notice of Default ("NOD"). There
interest rates. As a result, lenders liberalized theirwere 53,943 Notices of Default recorded in the
guidelines to maintain high loan volumes. But becausesecond quarter of 2007 (April to June). That is a
interest rates had risen, lender utilized adjustable ratesshocking number in itself, but even more devastatinging
mortgages with artificially low "teaser rates" to qualifywhen you consider that it was 15.4% increase from
more borrowers. Property owners took advantage ofthe previous quarter, and up an earth-shattering 158%
those loosened guidelines and teaser rates to obtaincompared with the same quarter of 2006.
loans in record numbers. Its those teaser rates, nowThis was the highest levels we have seen in California
adjusting up to higher market rates, that are causingsince 1996, when foreclosures were at their worst. In
the tsunami of foreclosures we are experiencing1996, for those of us that remember those dreadful
today.days, 61,541 foreclosures were started. The lowest
Keep in mind, there are 8.4 million houses and condoslevel recorded was in the third quarter of 2004, when
in California. The vast majority of those properties areonly 12,417 NODs were filed.
financed by mortgages that are current and continueAlthough 53,943 default notices were recorded in
to be current.California last quarter, only 50,901 properties were
Nevertheless, the loans that did fall into default lastaffected. How is that possible? Many homes are
quarter were mostly originated between July 2005 andfinanced using more than one loan, what are called
August 2006, which was at the height of the"piggy-back" loans. Utilizing multiple loans on the same
mortgage frenzy. The median price paid for aproperty helps homeowners avoid mortgage
California home purchased during that period wasinsurance. That is up 162.8% from the second quarter
$460,000. In contrast, the median price paid for thoseof 2006.
properties where mortgages went into default lastThe default numbers reflect wide regional differences.
quarter was only $445,500. (This discrepancy isThe second-quarter numbers were a record in
caused because there is a lower default rate withRiverside, San Bernardino, Contra Costa, Sacramento
higher valued properties.)and most Central Valley counties. However, in Los
The median mortgage for those properties isAngeles County, the state's largest, it was still less than
$342,000, and their mortgage payment ishalf the first-quarter 1996 peak. This reflects the depth
approximately $2,225 per month. Homeowners wereof the recession in the mid-1990s, as well as the
five months behind on their payments (up from threerelative strength of today's housing market.