Horse Art - Eadweard Muybridge, Leland Stanford, and the Hobby Horse

A collaboration between an English-born eccentricThe unaided human eye could not resolve that
Eadweard Muybridge and the founder of one of ourquestion.Eadweard MuybridgeEnter Muybridge. With a
great universities resulted in a series of events whichtempestuous personality, sporting a Walt Whitman
spelled the end of the "hobby-horse" posture in horsebeard, and carrying on in the grand tradition of the
art and paintings.Towards the end of the 19th century,English eccentric, it was said of Eadweard Muybridge
an event occurred which significantly changed thethat had he never been born a novelist would have
world of horse art, in particular paintings but forcreated him. Coming to America from England at an
sculpture as well. Until that time period, most paintingsearly age, Muybridge established a reputation as one
of horses at full gallop showed the front legs extendedof San Francisco's great 19th century landscape
forward and the hind legs extended to the rear. Unlessphotographers. Over time, his interests narrowed and
a horse's motion was to be similar to that of abecame focused upon photographing and studying the
rabbits's, this position would be anatomically impossible.motion of animals and people.Muybridge and Stanford
This posture by the way, is often referred to as themet in 1873 at which time Muybridge began to
rocking horse or hobby-horse posture. Can you imagephotograph Stanford's horses in motion. It should be
trying to stay in the saddle if a horse's motion was thenoted that at that time photographers often built their
same as a rabbit's? It would be an adventure to sayown equipment and mixed their own chemicals.
the least.Pleasure riding would be restricted to theExposure time was usually measured in seconds
walk, perhaps the slow trot. Canter? Forget it! Driving?rather than in tenths, much less one-hundredths of a
One horse or a team. Picture the effect if horses ransecond. Up to that time no photographer had been
like rabbits. It would likely shake the buggy apart in aable to capture events too rapid to be seen by the
short distance. Yet this was how horses at full gallopnaked eye.The two worked together for nearly ten
were generally portrayed.If you've ever tried to figureyears. During that time Muybridge continually improved
out the motion (or gait) of a horse, or a dog or cat forand refined his photographic processes. By 1877,
that matter at a walk, with a little concentration you'llMuybridge, in collaboration with Leland Stanford's
soon figure out the order in which the legs moved andengineering staff was able to photograph movement
when a hoof (or paw) leaves or touches the groundwith a shutter speed of 1/2000th of a second. It was
with respect to the position of the other legs. At a trothere that he provided conclusive proof that the horse
- more difficult but possible. But at a gallop or run -did have all four hooves off the ground during the
forget it (I've tried this walking behind our beagle) - thegallop.What was key to the world of horse art was
legs move faster than our eyes are capable offound in the photographs which showed every aspect
tracking. It's little wonder that until the advent ofof the horses' gait. The photos showed that, at full
photography there was a great deal of guesswork asgallop, all four hooves were for an instant under the
to how a horse actually moved at a canter orhorse and off the ground.In The Art of the Horse by
gallop.One artist who had a clue was the EnglishmanJohn Fairley there is a reproduction of a wonderful
whose meticulous studies of the horse's anatomypainting depicting the chariot races at the Circus
gave him an understanding as to what motion wasMaximus. It is an immensely realistic and powerful
possible and what was not.The "Farm"Leland Stanfordpainting. However, every horse under full gallop has
(1824-1893) - railroad executive, governer, senator,both front legs extended forward and both hind legs
pioneer in California's wine industry and founder ofextended to the rear. If that were the case it would be
Stanford University, was also a breeder and trainer ofamazing if the charioteer could stay aboard for even
horses. His farm (the Palo Alto Stock Farm) was oneone lap!When Muybridge's results became generally
of the finest for trotting horses in the United Statesknown (largely through publication in Scientific
and in the 1880's and 1890's home to 600 horses andAmerican in 1878) they were readily accepted by
150 trainers and staff. The "Farm" eventually becameartists such as Degas, Eakins, George Stubbs and
the site of Stanford University.The farm ( and later theRemington. Others, like Rodin had to go through a
city) was named after one of Stanford's great trottingperiod of "furious denial" before finally abandoning the
horses, Palo Alto. The horse was in turn named after"rocking horse" style. Muybridge continued his work up
the first major battlefield victory of the Mexican War.until his death in 1904. Like English painter John Stubbs'
Stanford's trotters won numerous trophies and ribbonsstudies of the anatomy of the horse, Muybridge's work
and several were credited with world record times. Inhad a profound influence on equine art. The artist could
his quest to breed the fastest possible trottersnow study detail that the human eye could not see.His
Stanford had a great interest in learning more andwork with Stanford attracted the attention of Thomas
more about them, including details of the gait. One ofEdison and, together with George Eastmans ongoing
the controversies at the time was whether or not awork in the development of film, set the stage for
horse ever was completely airborne during the canter.motion pictures.